🔗 Share this article

Deductibles. In-network. Non-preferred providers. Premium health services. Out-of-pocket expenses. Fixed payment. Shared insurance. Benefit advisers. Coverage agents. Medical advisors. ACA. Health Maintenance Organization. PPO. EPO. Point of Service. High Deductible Health Plan. Health Savings Account. Flexible Spending Account. HRA. Explanation of Benefits. Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act. SHOP. Single coverage. Dependent coverage. Insurance subsidies.

Baffled? You should be. Who comprehends all this stuff? Certainly not the average business owner. Neither the average employee. Selecting the appropriate healthcare insurance for companies – or for our families – seems like demands advanced expertise in medical insurance.

The Medical System Isn't Just Complex, It's Costly

According to a recent study, typical households pays $twenty-seven thousand each year on medical coverage (up 6% compared to last year). Typical employer health insurance cost is projected to surpass $seventeen thousand per employee in 2026, an increase of 9.5% from 2025.

Currently the government has ceased functioning because political disagreements over tax credits that experts say will lead to premium increases up to 100% for millions of Americans.

When Might We Seriously Consider National Health Insurance?

When will we seriously consider universal healthcare coverage here in America? I have to believe we're approaching that point since this can't continue.

I'm not proposing government-run medicine. I'm proposing that our already existing Medicare program – an established insurance framework – simply expand to cover everyone. The existing system doesn't change. How our healthcare providers receive payment changes. Believe me, they will adjust.

How National Health Insurance Would Work

Universal healthcare coverage would need contributions from both workers and companies. In similar programs, a worker earning moderate income pays approximately 5.3% toward medical coverage. The company pays about 13.75%.

Does this appear expensive? Unless you contrast that with what the typical American pays. I know multiple clients who are routinely paying anywhere from eight to fifteen percent of payroll costs for medical benefits. Remember that with inclusive programs, those payments include pension plans, sick pay, maternity leave and unemployment benefits along with funding medical services. When including these expenses versus what we pay for our retirement plans, unemployment insurance and vacation benefits, the gap narrows.

Execution in the US

In the US, universal healthcare funding would increase our Medicare tax deduction, a system that is already in place. It should be income-adjusted – those at higher income levels would pay more than lower-income earners. This includes both an employee and employer contribution. Similar to much of federal defense, IT, social programs and transportation services, the program should be outsourced by private contractors instead of federal agencies.

Advantages for Entrepreneurs

Universal healthcare coverage would be a significant advantage for entrepreneurs like mine. It would place us on a level playing field against big corporations that can pay for superior coverage. It would make management significantly simpler (automatic payroll withholding remitted like retirement and Medicare taxes, instead of separate payments to insurance companies and coverage administrators).

It would enable simpler to plan expenses annual expenditures, instead of going through the complex (and fruitless) theater of bargaining with the big insurance providers that we must do each year. Due to simplification, there would be improved comprehension about benefits among workers – as opposed to the current system where they have to interpret the complications of existing plans. Additionally there would certainly be reduced responsibility for employers as we no longer would be privy to our employees' medical records for weighing risks and different options.

Capitalist Perspective

I'm as pro-market as possible. But I've learned that public institutions play important functions in society, including national security to funding essential systems. Providing healthcare to all through a national insurance system strengthens our economy's infrastructure. It represents superior, easier system for entrepreneurs which hire more than half of the country's workers and generate half of our GDP. It makes it possible employees to be healthier, come to work more often and be more productive.

Addressing Concerns

Exist a million considerations I haven't covered? Of course there are. But with rising medical expenses experienced recently, it's clear that the Affordable Care Act is not working effectively. And I realize that America isn't a compact European nation where major reforms are easier to implement. But expanding Medicare for all, even with the additional taxes that would be incurred, would remain a better and more affordable strategy both for controlling healthcare costs but providing access for all citizens.

Need for Realistic Evaluation

We as Americans, we need to tone down national pride. America's medical care isn't exceptional. We rank well below numerous nations in healthcare quality globally, based on comprehensive research. Maybe one bright spot in this present circumstances could be that we take serious examination at ourselves and agree that major reforms need to happen.