🔗 Share this article

Do your LinkedIn connections recognizing you as a thought leader? Are hordes of respondents praising your advice on expanding your venture? Are headhunters reaching out to explore opportunities?

Should that not be the case, the reason could be that you're not male.

The Test: Modifying Profile Gender to achieve Better Visibility

Numerous women joined a collective professional network test this week following popular discussions indicated that switching their profile gender to "male" boosted their network presence.

Other testers modified their professional summaries to include what they called "bro-coded" terminology - adding results-driven business buzzwords like "drive", "transform" and "accelerate". Anecdotally, their exposure also improved.

Algorithmic Bias Concerns Brought Up

The improved metrics has led some to speculate whether an inherent sexism in LinkedIn's algorithm favors men who use professional networking terminology.

Like many large social media platforms, LinkedIn employs a computerized system to determine which content appear to which users - boosting some while suppressing others.

Company Statement

In a recent company announcement, LinkedIn acknowledged the phenomenon but claimed it does not consider "personal characteristics" when deciding content distribution. Instead, the company mentioned that "numerous factors" affect how content perform.

Modifying profile gender in your settings does not affect how your content appears in search or feed.

Individual Results

Simone Bonnett, who modified her pronouns to "he/him" and her name to "Simon E", described remarkable outcomes.

"The statistics I'm seeing show a 1,600% increase in profile views and a 1,300% increase in content views," she noted.

Megan Cornish, a marketing expert, began experimenting after observing her reach decline significantly.

The Process

• Initially, she modified her profile gender to "male"
• Subsequently, she used AI tools to rephrase her profile using "masculine-oriented" language
• Finally, she repurposed previous content with comparable "assertive" style

The result was immediate: a more than fourfold rise in visibility within one week.

The Negative Aspect

Although the positive results, Cornish expressed unhappiness with the method.

"Previously, my posts were more personal - concise and insightful, but also warm and relatable," she stated. "Now, the bro-coded version was assertive and confident - like a white male swaggering around."

She discontinued the test after seven days, stating "Each day I persisted, and outcomes improved, I became more frustrated."

Varying Outcomes

Not all participants experienced favorable results. Cass Cooper who modified both her gender to "male" and her ethnicity to "Caucasian" reported a reduction in reach and engagement.

"We know there's algorithmic bias, but it's extremely difficult to comprehend how it functions in specific cases or why," she remarked.

Wider Consequences

These experiments coincide with ongoing conversations about LinkedIn's unique role as both a business platform and social space.

Platform modifications in the past few months have reportedly caused women professionals experiencing markedly lower exposure, leading to informal experiments where identical posts by men and women received dramatically unequal reach.

System Details

According to LinkedIn, the platform uses artificial intelligence to categorize and distribute content based on multiple factors, including what's shared and the member's career profile.

The company states it regularly evaluates its algorithms, including "checks for inequalities based on gender."

A spokesperson proposed that current reductions in some users' reach might stem from increased competition due to more content on the platform.

Evolving Environment

According to a tester observed, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be increasing on the network.

"People often view LinkedIn as more businesslike and refined," she commented. "That's changing. It's becoming increasingly aggressive and unpredictable."