🔗 Share this article

British American Tobacco has been accused of “utter hypocrisy” for campaigning against anti-smoking regulations in Africa which are already enforced in the UK.

African regulatory opposition

Correspondence acquired by reporters originating from the company’s subsidiary in Zambia to the nation's political leaders requests measures restricting tobacco advertising and sponsorship to be scrapped or postponed.

The company is attempting changes to a draft bill that include reductions in the proposed size of pictorial cautions on cigarette packaging, the withdrawal of controls on flavored smoking items, and reduced sanctions for any companies violating the new laws.

Activist commentary

“Were I in government, I would say that they enable the defense of the British people and sustain the fatalities of the Zambian people,” stated Master Chimbala.

More than 7,000 Zambians a year succumb to tobacco-related illnesses, according to global health agency statistics.

Chimbala said the letter was understood to have been copied to various ministerial offices and was in circulation among community advocacy networks.

International corporate influence worries

This occurs during wider concerns about industry interference with public health regulations. Last month, global health authorities sounded an alarm that the smoking product companies was intensifying efforts to dilute worldwide restrictions.

“Evidence exists of corporate influence globally. Tobacco company fingerprints are on delayed tax increases in Indonesia, stalled legislation in Zambia and even a weakened declaration at the UN international gathering,” stated the corporate monitoring director.

Likely impacts

“When public health regulation doesn't get enacted because of this letter, the cost might be borne in individuals' health who might potentially stop smoking.”

The anti-smoking legislation going through Zambia’s parliament includes measures that exceed UK legislation by extending coverage to e-cigarettes, and stipulating that graphic health warnings cover seventy-five percent of product packaging.

Business countermeasures

Through correspondence, the corporation proposes this be reduced to 30% or 50% “within the WHO-FCTC suggested parameters”, postponed for minimum one year after the bill passes.

The WHO specifically advises a alert needs to encompass at least half of the cigarette package face “and seek to occupy as much of the main visible surfaces as possible”. In the UK, warnings must cover sixty-five percent of a product container sides.

Flavor restrictions debate

BAT asks for the withdrawal of extensive controls on flavored cigarette varieties, arguing that it would drive users to “illegally traded” products. The company proposes prohibiting a smaller list of “flavours based on desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. Each flavored smoking item have been prohibited in Britain since 2020.

The pending regulation proposes sanctions for different infractions “ranging from a portion of yearly revenue to a decade in prison”.

Business explanation

Via documentation, the company executive of the African subsidiary claims the firm is “committed to ethical business practices” and “backs the goals of governments to reduce smoking incidence and the related medical consequences” but maintains that “some regulations can have unwelcome and unexpected consequences.”

Activist reaction

Chimbala said the corporation's recommended amendments would “weaken this legislation so much that the necessary effect for it to produce permanent improvement in society will not be achieved”.

The fact that many such provisions operated within the UK, where the company maintains its main office, was “complete contradiction”, he commented.

“We exist in a global village. When I cultivate smoking products in my garden and collect the yield and sell it out – and my children do not consume tobacco, but my community's youth consumes … to benefit personally and all the subsequent offspring while my neighbour’s children are succumbing … is in itself absolute spiritual bankruptcy.”

Anti-smoking regulations in the United Kingdom or other countries had not caused companies to close, the campaigner stated. “Legislation never shuts down the industry. It only protects the people.”

Official corporate statement

The corporate communicator commented: “The corporation runs its business in compliance with applicable local laws. Further, the firm contributes in the country’s legislative process in line with the appropriate structures which allow for interested party involvement in legislation creation.”

The company was “not resisting legislation”, the representative commented, noting that young individuals should be protected from acquiring smoking products and nicotine.

“We support developing rules to accomplish desired public health goals, while accepting the variety of rights and obligations on businesses, users and involved parties,” the spokesperson stated, adding that the corporation's recommendations “mirror the circumstances of the local commercial environment and tobacco industry, which includes increasing amounts of black market activity”.

The nation's ministry of business, commercial affairs and industrial development was contacted for response.